Жители Санкт-Петербурга устроили «крысогон»17:52
Browser font fallback determines the threat. When a page specifies font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif and a string contains Cyrillic а, the browser checks Arial’s glyph tables, finds Cyrillic coverage, and renders it using Arial’s Cyrillic glyphs — which are pixel-identical to the Latin ones. The CSS font stack you ship determines which column of the danger rate table applies to your users. Arial at 40.8% is a different risk profile from Didot at 19.2%.
Мощный удар Израиля по Ирану попал на видео09:41
No evidence has been presented that these safeguards are insufficient to continue to protect Android users as they have for the entire seventeen years of Android’s existence. If Google’s concern is genuinely about security rather than control, it should invest in improving these existing mechanisms rather than creating new bottlenecks and centralizing control.
While newer venues can build-in connectivity for their own operations while offering ticket holders better wi-fi, and even mobile coverage, visitors to other sites continue to struggle.