I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Филолог заявил о массовой отмене обращения на «вы» с большой буквы09:36
，这一点在搜狗输入法2026中也有详细论述
圖像來源，Getty Images
這部劇的爆紅讓業內人士、評論家、甚至創作者和主演們都感到意外。尤其在西方，更讓人訝異的是它吸引了大量女性觀眾——異性戀、酷兒、跨性別者、「紅酒媽媽」、年輕女性，甚至祖母們的臉書（Facebook）社群，都在熱情擁抱劇中呈現的細膩親密情感。